Lighting and it’s intensity changed throughout the galleries due to light panels in the ceilings, the light could change with the weather or time of day, so often the atmosphere in the galleries would change without any man made intervention. The light panels could however be covered over – blocking out all natural light as was done in Galleries 1 & 2
Gallery 1 relied on artificial light, a little natural light would have worked it’s way through the glass door but it had no windows and it’s ceiling panels were covered. For me this felt harsh and likely another reason why this space did not feel so comfortable. The down facing strip lights however provided pleasant shadows on the floor and it’s directional spot lights illuminated exhibits and caused strong shadows on the walls. I noticed that peoples shadows did not appear to cover exhibits on the walls, which I thought was a clever aspect of the lighting design. The bright lights however bounced off the glass which to me felt glaring and although the temperature was pleasant within the room it provided me with a sense of coldness.
The shapes and forms is Gallery 1 however contrasted with some of the feelings I had about this space. The curving tables and metal structure were fluid, provided pattern and movement within the space. The honeycombed structure of the metal sheeting was organic and softened the feelings of rigidity and exclusion that a solid barrier would suggest.
Gallery 2s exhibits were varied; gentle curved walls, round stone structures, angular glass cabinets, large fluid exhibits and pointy weird exhibits. A plethora of forms and shapes which deserved a range of lighting and which created an abundance of visual and emotional experiences.
Blocking out natural light in gallery 2 worked to provide the dark, moody, captivating experience in this space. The artificial light was kept dim providing soft low shadows on the floor. Directional light illuminated exhibits, which against the dark walls lured you in and made strong shadows providing an almost matching object, which furthered the sometimes menacing feeling this gallery presented.
Gallery 3 had a mix of artificial and natural light. It’s ceiling panels were uncovered to allow in some light on what was a rather dull day. The room was well lit but had a softness, which felt gentle and calm. Spot lights accentuated works of art but not garishly, there seemed to be a subtlety in the directional lighting in this space.
I have already commented how at ease and free I felt to walk around this space, of which I am certain the lighting contributed to. Gallery 2 however was where I felt a a greater sense of freedom a space to breath and enjoy the expanse of height. Forms within the room were spaced to allow ease of movement and the large ceiling panel and huge window allowed the room to flood with natural light. This natural light I am sure eased tension providing feeling of openness and a sense of being at one with ones self.
Lee's study journey 